Blog 2023 Malcolm Blair-Robinson

The latest papers coming from the government explaining its negotiating position, a revelation both for the UK and the EU, is proving beyond all doubt that the project is incapable of being delivered in the terms in which it was promised and that the mandate authorising it was based on a completely flawed understanding of what leaving the EU would actually entail and what it would really mean. That is a terrible indictment of the political class for which it will one day pay a very heavy price.

It also reinforces the increasing number of informed and sober opinions that in the end the outcome will either be very similar to being in the EU without the involvement in the political process of running it, or the whole project will collapse and be abandoned. Because the more the whole undertaking is exposed, the less are the apparent advantages of being out over in. The political reality of that is that few if any voted to be worse off. We need to remember we live in a democracy which, when cheated, will have its revenge.

Ideal holiday/travel reading. From departure lounge to beach, two compelling reads with a spooky touch. From .99p download and £4.99 paperback. ($1.29 and $.7.99)

         Click Images  U.K.

U.S.  Amazon.com                U.S. Amazon.com

The fundamentals have not changed and the posture of this blog remains. It is this. The central government in Afghanistan is corrupt and does not command the support of the whole country. Left to its own devices it would be overthrown. US forces, now largely in an advisory and training role and supported by NATO contributions, prevent that happening. Even so, the Taliban now control almost half the country. So the mission, after sixteen years and between one and two trillion dollars spent and nearly 2500 American lives lost, is failing by any rational standard.

Without a central government capable of clean rule for all, which has majority support across the country and is accepted  or participated in by the Taliban, there can be no solution. All the military might of America cannot deliver this fundamental foundation to move forward. Trump’s instinct was to pull out.

He has changed his mind because there is a real risk that IS, in retreat all over the Middle East, will re-establish itself in Afghanistan. Al Qaeda hangs on there as well. To prevent this the US military want to beef up their operation to support the Afghan government forces and perhaps play a more proactive role, at least to stop further loss of territory to the Taliban and for sure to crush the IS threat. On the face of it that makes sense.

So does the desire to negotiate with the Taliban and to engage with Pakistan and India, not only to join in the process of finding a settlement, but also to resolve their own differences which contribute to instability in the region. Failure to do any of this could precipitate a Taliban take over on its own terms, triggering another mass migration with which Europe would be hard pressed to cope. Moreover there must be enough troops to deal with IS decisively and enough lateral thinking to understand that the Taliban is an ally in that aim. As are both Pakistan and India. The details are not yet clear but the clear impression from the Trump administration is that all branches understand this.

Nevertheless the core problem remains, even after this re-engagement gets under way. The central government in Kabul is fundamentally incompetent and corrupt, not as bad as the last one certainly, but still not good enough to prevail. Until that is put right there can be no solution. So the US and NATO will either have to abandon the project and let Afghanistan  go its own way like Viet Nam, where the corrupt government of South Vietnam torpedoed the entire US effort,  or stay at least to contain the terrorist threats within Afghanistan’s own borders. That could be a long haul. Think 100 years. Even then it may fail. It always has in the past.