Archive for January 24th, 2011

Banking Reform

Monday, January 24th, 2011

This Blog is now going to set out its stall to rebuild our financial system. No doubt the IBC will be more sophisticated, but I doubt it will be more fundamental.

The Banks must be broken into distinct and financially separate arms, for what was once banking, but what is High Street or consumer banking in modern terms, and speculation, gambling and betting, which is today’s curious misname for investment banking. There is a third element, which was once called merchant banking; maybe that too will need to stand alone.

The High Street Banks are now too big;  there are only five and this is too few for an SME economy (small to medium enterprise), which is what ours is. America is dominated by big corporations. GM, Microsoft, Apple, Boeing and so forth. Giant banks may be good for this, although they retain a web of local banks, even after the crash. We have no local banks, only giants. This will have to change.

Building societies have to be reborn as mutual savings societies, not quasi or actual banks. They are needed for their savings products, especially for the retired, and for their mortgage funds. Properly run, they are immensely strong financially. They have no place for shareholders. Remember the big names like  Halifax, Abbey, Alliance and Leicester all became shareholder owned banks and all went bust or had to be rescued on the brink. We need these mutual institutions back again. Their roots are in the community. This is important.

All the institutions concerned with financing the cogs of the economy and enabling the every day financial system to run, will have to be organised and managed to the highest standards of probity and prudence. There will have to be a safety net of last resort. Speculative banking on the other hand, the element which houses within the ranks of its payroll individuals of such genius that it has to pay them millions or they will run away to China, will stand upon their own feet and if things go wrong, down they will be allowed to go  hook, line and sinker. No help or bail out. Total loss for shareholders.

These and some other reforms which time and experience will reveal, will put our economy back on a track which can reliably carry the engine of national recovery. It is worth pointing out that this will not be on a bed of borrowing. We became addicted to borrowing for everything. That is the bad way and that era has passed. The lending figures confirm this. For once I agree with the banks. The politicians are wrong. Lending is down because the demand is not there. Faced with the risks and true costs of borrowing people and business would rather manage without. Far from being a sign of stagnation, it is the seed of a sound recovery. We must nurture it well.

Selling The Forests

Monday, January 24th, 2011

This is a bad idea. Small government does not mean the State has no role, nor that it should not have assets. The Thatcher revolution which brought about the privatisation of state enterprise was a very good idea, but like many good ideas, it lacked the judgement to know when to stop. Thus we ended up with Spanish airports and water, French power generation and so on. Some things work better, a good many do not.

There is no more fundamental national asset than the land we tread in common, nor more environmentally useful organisation than the Forestry Commission. Neither must be touched. We have many good things in our national fabric and we must leave well alone. The Archbishop of Canterbury leads the protest. His leadership is timely.

The Tory element of this Coalition needs to reign in on those who want reform for its own, or some ideological, reason. So much of our country is bust and dysfunctional, they have more than enough to get on with. Remember the global financial crash had its origins in Tory ideas. It would be bad politics to hand Labour an opportunity to attack on that front. Andy Coulson, Cameron’s erstwhile ear of the people, would agree.